Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Rotation Advertisements



We hope you enjoy your visit to this forum.


If you are reading this then it means you are currently browsing the forum as a guest, we don’t limit any of the content posted from guests however if you join, you will have the ability to join the discussions! We are always happy to see new faces at this forum and we would like to hear your opinion, so why not register now? It doesn’t take long and you can get posting right away.


Click here to Register!

If you are having difficulties validating your account please email us at admin@dbzf.co.uk


If you're already a member please log in to your account:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
Scotland votes no to independence.
Topic Started: Sep 19 2014, 05:00 AM (904 Views)
+ Steve
Member Avatar
Greetings. I will be your waifu this season.

Rogue
Sep 20 2014, 09:36 AM
People are also blaming the English and the BBC....
That's nothing new we blame them for everything :p worse when each half of our people hates each other.

Let's turn in to Korea! That would be weird, I'm in the top half so we need a crazy leader.


I wonder how many people didn't vote and if they'd have changed it much...I didn't voting was too scary as was going to a place full of drunk people were the polling station was :rofl:
Posted Image


Definitely not a succubus, fear not
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Zenet
Default Avatar


Surprisingly Scotland threw away independence. Scotland and England are not similar, historically or culturally to be one country alongside Wales and NI. Unionists voting no, don't realize "British" is a geographic term not culturally an identity. The vote for no may have been for economic and political reasons or to be part of a greater country. But in no effective union does one of the units represent 85% of the population and economic output. That is the lesson of the former USSR, dominated by Russia. By voting no to independence Scotland is indirectly a subject to England's sphere of influence, remaining as a satellite state.

My point is the only way the UK can work is if it adopts a fredal type gonvenemt. The first answer is to create English regional bodies with legislative powers. Each having about same population as Wales and Scotland. Or else what you Currently have is, England being the successor state of the UK which is only a union by name.
Edited by Zenet, Sep 20 2014, 03:13 PM.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
* Yu Narukami
Default Avatar
Izanagi!

Zenet
Sep 20 2014, 03:10 PM
Surprisingly Scotland threw away independence. Scotland and England are not similar, historically or culturally to be one country alongside Wales and NI. Unionists voting no, don't realize "British" is a geographic term not culturally an identity. The vote for no may have been for economic and political reasons or to have the feeling of being part of something greater. But in no effective union does one of the units represent 85% of the population and economic output. That is the lesson of the former USSR, dominated by Russia. By voting no to independence Scotland is indirectly a subject to England's sphere of influence, remaining as a satellite state.

My point is the only way the UK can work is if it adopts a fredal type gonvenemt. The first answer is to create English regional bodies with legislative powers. Each having about same population as Wales and Scotland. Or else what you Currently have is, England being the successor state of the UK which is only a union by name.
There are talks of even more devolution to Wales, Scotland and North Ireland, so adopting a federal system isn't necessary. If we develop our system of devolution and make the powers that each country possesses quite extensive, then we'd be in a pretty good situation.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Meowth
Member Avatar
=._.=

I don't think a devolved English parliament is a good idea, if it wasn't for the other nations of the UK, we'd be stuck with a tory government for years and years, that would be bad for England. Well, bad for the common folk, if you're rich, it'd be fine.
Posted Image
Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Create your own social network with a free forum.
« Previous Topic · General Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2

Theme Designed by McKee91