| We hope you enjoy your visit to this forum. If you are reading this then it means you are currently browsing the forum as a guest, we don’t limit any of the content posted from guests however if you join, you will have the ability to join the discussions! We are always happy to see new faces at this forum and we would like to hear your opinion, so why not register now? It doesn’t take long and you can get posting right away. Click here to Register! If you are having difficulties validating your account please email us at admin@dbzf.co.uk If you're already a member please log in to your account: |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Scotland votes no to independence. | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Sep 19 2014, 05:00 AM (904 Views) | |
| + Steve | Sep 20 2014, 12:31 PM Post #16 |
![]()
Greetings. I will be your waifu this season.
![]()
|
That's nothing new we blame them for everything worse when each half of our people hates each other.Let's turn in to Korea! That would be weird, I'm in the top half so we need a crazy leader. I wonder how many people didn't vote and if they'd have changed it much...I didn't voting was too scary as was going to a place full of drunk people were the polling station was
|
![]() Definitely not a succubus, fear not | |
![]() |
|
| Zenet | Sep 20 2014, 03:10 PM Post #17 |
![]()
|
Surprisingly Scotland threw away independence. Scotland and England are not similar, historically or culturally to be one country alongside Wales and NI. Unionists voting no, don't realize "British" is a geographic term not culturally an identity. The vote for no may have been for economic and political reasons or to be part of a greater country. But in no effective union does one of the units represent 85% of the population and economic output. That is the lesson of the former USSR, dominated by Russia. By voting no to independence Scotland is indirectly a subject to England's sphere of influence, remaining as a satellite state. My point is the only way the UK can work is if it adopts a fredal type gonvenemt. The first answer is to create English regional bodies with legislative powers. Each having about same population as Wales and Scotland. Or else what you Currently have is, England being the successor state of the UK which is only a union by name. Edited by Zenet, Sep 20 2014, 03:13 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| * Yu Narukami | Sep 20 2014, 03:14 PM Post #18 |
|
Izanagi!
![]()
|
There are talks of even more devolution to Wales, Scotland and North Ireland, so adopting a federal system isn't necessary. If we develop our system of devolution and make the powers that each country possesses quite extensive, then we'd be in a pretty good situation. |
![]() |
|
| Meowth | Sep 20 2014, 08:05 PM Post #19 |
![]()
=._.=
![]()
|
I don't think a devolved English parliament is a good idea, if it wasn't for the other nations of the UK, we'd be stuck with a tory government for years and years, that would be bad for England. Well, bad for the common folk, if you're rich, it'd be fine. |
![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · General Discussion · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
4:35 PM Jul 13
|
Theme Designed by McKee91
Powered by ZetaBoards Premium · Privacy Policy





worse when each half of our people hates each other.











4:35 PM Jul 13